1 |
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:56:16PM -0500 or thereabouts, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
2 |
> What about cvsup? I know it doesn't work on very many architectures |
3 |
> currently, but it may be an acceptable method of obtaining the |
4 |
> development modules (and CVS files to go with them) if we had a box to |
5 |
> act as a cvsup server. |
6 |
|
7 |
If we're just talking about doing this to make things like current portage |
8 |
source available, then I'd much rather look at generating tarballs and |
9 |
placing them on the mirrors, much like we do w/ the portage tree itself. |
10 |
|
11 |
It's no secret that I'm not a fan of pserver -- it's a security nightmare |
12 |
waiting to happen imo. (oh wait -- it's already happened...) The only way |
13 |
I'd feel reasonably comfortable about implementing it is if it was on its |
14 |
own machine, segregated from the rest of our network. |
15 |
|
16 |
--kurt |