1 |
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 12:21, Moritz Schulte wrote: |
2 |
> Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@××××××.nl> writes: |
3 |
> > Most people do agree though that a kernel alone cannot make an |
4 |
> > operating system, while it is certainly the most important part of |
5 |
> > it. That's why a lot of people just call the linux-and-gnu based |
6 |
> > operating system linux. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Interesting, that makes me remember the Ford/Mazda comparison somebody |
9 |
> mentioned in this thread: while the Mazda engine is probably the most |
10 |
> important part of the system (the "kernel"), the complete car (the |
11 |
> system as a whole) is named Ford and not Mazda. ;-) But it would be |
12 |
> wrong and weird IMHO to not mention the engine in our car... |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
To take this into the car analogies. |
16 |
|
17 |
The car called Linux or Gnu linux |
18 |
Engine: made by Linus Torvalds & co. branded linux |
19 |
Gearbox: made by FSF branded glibc |
20 |
Steering wheel: various misc products by FSF (tar, gzip, bzip2, cpio, cvs, |
21 |
diffutils, bash, ed, emacs, etc.) |
22 |
Body: made (in most cases) by Xfree86.org, branded X |
23 |
Paint: The buyer can choose between several styles, the most notable KDE and |
24 |
GNOME. |
25 |
Oil: Made by various authors: (hdparm, iptables, util-linux, modutils, |
26 |
e2fstools, etc.) |
27 |
Construction facility: made by FSF branded gcc and binutils |
28 |
Design tools: made by FSF and branded automake and autoconf. |
29 |
|
30 |
Of course there are plenty of optional add-ons to the linux car that need not |
31 |
all be made using the standard tools/components, but the majority of the |
32 |
add-ons are. |
33 |
|
34 |
Paul |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Paul de Vrieze |
38 |
Junior Researcher |
39 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
40 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |