Archives
Archives
| From: | John Newman <jnn@××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@××××××.nl> | ||
| Cc: | Brandon Low <lostlogic@g.o>, gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-sources-r9 kernel sources vs. XFS patch | ||
| Date: | Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:20:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20021026192033.GA1178@sparc.cachehit.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-sources-r9 kernel sources vs. XFS patch by Seth Mos |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:08:19AM +0200, Seth Mos wrote: |
| 2 | > At 11:13 24-10-2002 -0500, Brandon Low wrote: |
| 3 | > XFS is already merged in since 2.5.36. The integration with the 2.4 tree is |
| 4 | > a ongoing project. It might be integrated into 2.4 in the future when |
| 5 | > marcelo thinks the time is right. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Speaking of 2.5.X.... does anyone know of a current 2.5.X kernel that is |
| 8 | know to be more-or-less stable and well-performing? And XFS on-disk |
| 9 | format is the same for 2.5 and 2.4, right? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | thanks, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | john |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-sources-r9 kernel sources vs. XFS patch | Seth Mos <knuffie@××××××.nl> |