| 1 |
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, John Newman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:08:19AM +0200, Seth Mos wrote: |
| 4 |
> > At 11:13 24-10-2002 -0500, Brandon Low wrote: |
| 5 |
> > XFS is already merged in since 2.5.36. The integration with the 2.4 tree is |
| 6 |
> > a ongoing project. It might be integrated into 2.4 in the future when |
| 7 |
> > marcelo thinks the time is right. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Speaking of 2.5.X.... does anyone know of a current 2.5.X kernel that is |
| 10 |
> know to be more-or-less stable and well-performing? And XFS on-disk |
| 11 |
> format is the same for 2.5 and 2.4, right? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Yes. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I have reports that 2.5.43 seemed to be almost usable for a desktop. |
| 16 |
At least it wouldn't eat your filesystems on IDE disks. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Cheers |
Archives