| 1 |
On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:41:39 Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> >> I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors |
| 9 |
> >> behave with arrows. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > It's supposed to say this: |
| 12 |
> >> In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used, the filename used |
| 13 |
> >> when saving to \t{DISTDIR} shall instead be the name on the right of |
| 14 |
> >> the arrow. When consulting mirrors (except for those explicitly |
| 15 |
> >> listed on the left of the arrow, if \t{mirror://} is used), the |
| 16 |
> >> filename to the right of the arrow shall be requested instead of the |
| 17 |
> >> filename in the URI. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > But it didn't, thanks to a formatting screwup. I've fixed that now. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I think Markos is talking about the actual mirror-fetch script itself. |
| 22 |
> The gentoo mirrors still use a flat namespace so someone will need to |
| 23 |
> update mirror-fetch to rename files based on src_uri arrows. And by |
| 24 |
> 'someone' I mean Zac. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -A |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> > -- |
| 29 |
> > Ciaran McCreesh |
| 30 |
Actually I didn't understand completely what Ciaran said. I am still not |
| 31 |
quite sure how mirrors treat the SRC_URI with arrows. Will they fetch the file |
| 32 |
from upstream as save it with the filename I specified on arrow or they will |
| 33 |
save it respecting the upstream filename? :) |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
| 36 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 37 |
KDE/Qt/Sunrise/Sound |
| 38 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.gr |
Archives