| 1 |
On Friday 14 July 2006 11:09, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > While it is a "working" solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> You can take over xine-lib and fix it however you prefer. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> As this, as well as any other idea you can find, is just an HACK until |
| 8 |
> portage devs implements the per-package use.mask that i asked WAY before |
| 9 |
> 2.1 release, but was then left OUT of the freeze and thus of the featureset |
| 10 |
> we can use 6 months from now, I REFUSE to change the behaviour. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
/me humps angry over worked flameeyes |
| 13 |
-mike |
Archives