| 1 |
On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> While it is a "working" solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one. |
| 3 |
You can take over xine-lib and fix it however you prefer. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
As this, as well as any other idea you can find, is just an HACK until portage |
| 6 |
devs implements the per-package use.mask that i asked WAY before 2.1 release, |
| 7 |
but was then left OUT of the freeze and thus of the featureset we can use 6 |
| 8 |
months from now, I REFUSE to change the behaviour. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You should know better than me this problem, considering that you masked |
| 11 |
media-video/transcode on x86 2.4 profile because it was depending on |
| 12 |
linux-headers 2.6 (as it should have been) with v4l2 useflag enabled. You |
| 13 |
should have use.masked (as it was later done) that useflag as it's 2.6 |
| 14 |
specific, and I did it that way to satisfy sparc requirement of not having |
| 15 |
v4l useflag present for them, as it failed with 2.4 kernel. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So if I didn't do it that way, forcing people wanting v4l support to use v4l |
| 18 |
v4l2, now I should still have the stupid, broken, idiotic transcode 0.6 in |
| 19 |
the tree, or one of the x86 deptrees broken, or one of the x86 deptrees with |
| 20 |
NO v4l at all. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ |
| 24 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives