1 |
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:09 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
3 |
> > While it is a "working" solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one. |
4 |
> You can take over xine-lib and fix it however you prefer. |
5 |
|
6 |
Quite honestly, I don't care. |
7 |
|
8 |
> As this, as well as any other idea you can find, is just an HACK until portage |
9 |
> devs implements the per-package use.mask that i asked WAY before 2.1 release, |
10 |
> but was then left OUT of the freeze and thus of the featureset we can use 6 |
11 |
> months from now, I REFUSE to change the behaviour. |
12 |
|
13 |
See, it is this kind of self-serving attitude that really needs to stop |
14 |
around here. So the portage devs didn't include something that you |
15 |
wanted in the latest release... Did you give them a patch for it? |
16 |
Making decisions like this that confuse our users and make the |
17 |
distribution harder to use and more inconsistent because you have a |
18 |
personal beef with another team simply because they didn't drop |
19 |
everything and do what you wanted them to work on instead of what they |
20 |
already had on their plates does not help our distribution. Instead, it |
21 |
makes us look like a bunch of selfish little babies. |
22 |
|
23 |
No thanks. I would much rather have a consistent and working |
24 |
distribution than cater to some childish self-important bullshit that |
25 |
only harms our users. |
26 |
|
27 |
> You should know better than me this problem, considering that you masked |
28 |
> media-video/transcode on x86 2.4 profile because it was depending on |
29 |
> linux-headers 2.6 (as it should have been) with v4l2 useflag enabled. You |
30 |
> should have use.masked (as it was later done) that useflag as it's 2.6 |
31 |
> specific, and I did it that way to satisfy sparc requirement of not having |
32 |
> v4l useflag present for them, as it failed with 2.4 kernel. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> So if I didn't do it that way, forcing people wanting v4l support to use v4l |
35 |
> v4l2, now I should still have the stupid, broken, idiotic transcode 0.6 in |
36 |
> the tree, or one of the x86 deptrees broken, or one of the x86 deptrees with |
37 |
> NO v4l at all. |
38 |
|
39 |
I don't give a crap about transcode. I was talking about USE=mp3. |
40 |
Changing the subject doesn't help anyone. |
41 |
|
42 |
Anyway, I can see that I'm just going to be ignored, and since I don't |
43 |
have the time to personally take over xine-lib, I'm going to drop it and |
44 |
just let you do whatever it is you think is "best" instead. |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Chris Gianelloni |
48 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
49 |
x86 Architecture Team |
50 |
Games - Developer |
51 |
Gentoo Linux |