| 1 |
Il giorno sab, 07/08/2010 alle 17.15 -0700, Alec Warner ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Why not just set some LDFLAGS that totally won't work (-Wl, taters) |
| 4 |
> and then assume anything that actually compiles with those flags set |
| 5 |
> does not respect LDFLAGS. Set that up on a tinderbox instead of |
| 6 |
> making users do it. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Because such negative tests don't get far away: a single package failing |
| 9 |
will drop its whole deptree from merging. And we have much more |
| 10 |
important things to look for with a tinderbox than this, given the |
| 11 |
amount of (failure) builds you'd be expected to see with this approach. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 15 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives