| 1 |
On 08/23/05 Ricardo Loureiro wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:41:35 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > portage-ng is dead. There is a rewrite going on, but it'll take a |
| 7 |
> > while |
| 8 |
> > to get anywhere near usable. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I searched a bit to find information about portage-ng but the only |
| 11 |
> doc I found was Daniel's pdf with just a drawing of the arch itself, |
| 12 |
> nothing very useful to me. Also the latest news go back almost 2 |
| 13 |
> years. Is there a place with more information on what portage-ng |
| 14 |
> should be? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Nope. It was basically one of Daniels naive visions mixed with Pieters |
| 17 |
science blabla (nothing against science, but I wouldn't call a package |
| 18 |
repository a knowledge base). If there is any actual information in |
| 19 |
portage-ng, you have to ask Pieter, but officially it's dead (was never |
| 20 |
alive really), but don't hope to get anything more than "it's using |
| 21 |
advanced science, it works and I'll release the code someday". |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Marius |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 29 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives