| 1 |
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:41:35 +0100 |
| 2 |
Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> portage-ng is dead. There is a rewrite going on, but it'll take a |
| 5 |
> while |
| 6 |
> to get anywhere near usable. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I searched a bit to find information about portage-ng but the only |
| 9 |
doc I found was Daniel's pdf with just a drawing of the arch itself, |
| 10 |
nothing very useful to me. Also the latest news go back almost 2 |
| 11 |
years. Is there a place with more information on what portage-ng |
| 12 |
should be? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Ricardo Loureiro |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B7C0EC0 |
Archives