| 1 |
> Should I compile all 4 of them? Yes doing this would take some bash magic but |
| 2 |
> not too much. If I should do all four of them what naming convention should I |
| 3 |
> use for the differant executables? Some thing like nethackQt nethackGnome? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I would say yes, do this. If you need an example, look at: |
| 6 |
app-editors/vim for example, it builds a GUI version and a non-GUI version. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It's really not that hard. The way I would lay it out is: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
# handle use options common to all types |
| 11 |
use foo && myconf="$myconf --enable-foo" |
| 12 |
use foo2 && myconf="$myconf --enable-foo2" |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
# handle first possible build type |
| 15 |
if [ "`use gnome`" ]; |
| 16 |
then |
| 17 |
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=$CHOST \ |
| 18 |
--mandir=/usr/share/man --enable-gtk --enable-gnome $myconf \ |
| 19 |
|| die "gnome & gtk configure failed" |
| 20 |
emake || die "gnome & gtk make failed" |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
mv src/foo src/gfoo |
| 23 |
fi |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
# handle second possible build type |
| 26 |
if [ "`use kde`" ]; |
| 27 |
then |
| 28 |
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=$CHOST \ |
| 29 |
--mandir=/usr/share/man --enable-qt --enable-kde $myconf \ |
| 30 |
|| die "kde & qt configure failed" |
| 31 |
emake || die "kde & qt make failed" |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
mv src/foo src/kfoo |
| 34 |
fi |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
# handle normal build type |
| 37 |
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=$CHOST \ |
| 38 |
--mandir=/usr/share/man $myconf \ |
| 39 |
|| die "normal configure failed" |
| 40 |
emake || die "normal make failed" |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
My example may not be perfect, but you get the idea (I hope) |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-Jared H. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> Should I just pick one of them and compile that one? What if I pick the one |
| 49 |
> the user doesn't want? |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> Should I force some user interaction with the build process? Other words ask |
| 52 |
> them which one they want? I don't really like this option myself. |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> And now even more questions. |
| 55 |
> On instalation of the above should I create menu items in KDE and GNOME if the |
| 56 |
> user has them? And a side question to that is it seems that KDE does not |
| 57 |
> automaticly include the GNOME apps but GNOME does automaticly include he KDE |
| 58 |
> apps so if I'm doing a KDE build should I add it to the GNOME menu if they |
| 59 |
> have it. And the reverse if I'm doing a GNOME build should I add that to the |
| 60 |
> KDE menus? |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> Any thoughts on the above would be helpfull. |
| 63 |
> Thanks |
| 64 |
> Richard Jackson |
| 65 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 66 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 67 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 68 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives