| 1 |
On 8.11.2022 2.23, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Of course if somebody wants to contribute to 100% FOSS tinderbox |
| 4 |
> efforts that would be even better. Perhaps if our 100% FOSS tinderbox |
| 5 |
> efforts addressed our needs very well, then nobody would want to |
| 6 |
> bother with the proprietary reports, or generating them. IMO it would |
| 7 |
> be better to create the FOSS solution before abandoning the |
| 8 |
> proprietary one. Doing otherwise is basically burning bridges - it |
| 9 |
> can be motivating in a sense but not really ideal. I'd love to have a |
| 10 |
> 100% FOSS solution around all of this, but I appreciate what has been |
| 11 |
> created and can hardly criticize volunteers for failing to make it |
| 12 |
> happen, especially since I haven't contributed to that myself. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/tinderbox-cluster.git/ |
| 16 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Tinderbox-cluster |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Hopefully soon. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- juippis |
Archives