| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Alex Alexander wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Am I the only one who thinks that this dep:{build,...} thing looks |
| 4 |
> really ugly and is hard to read? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
+1 |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> IMO simply removing the "dep" part would greatly improve things: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> DEPENDENCIES=" |
| 11 |
> :build,run? ( ... ) |
| 12 |
> :run? ( ... ) |
| 13 |
> " |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
IMHO it would improve readability even more if we would stay with our |
| 16 |
traditional *DEPEND variables. In any case, package managers will have |
| 17 |
to support them indefinitely for existing EAPIs. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ulrich |
Archives