Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alex Alexander <wired@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 16:33:42
Message-Id: CAMUzOag1GDyJYRZTDa6zfEgJfqM22mFZ+A9X+ka=HeUA-zq1Hg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal by Brian Harring
1 On Sep 16, 2012 4:55 PM, "Brian Harring" <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > Folks-
4 >
5 > Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
6 > proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
7 >
8 > The live version of the doc is available at
9 >
10 http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
11
12 Am I the only one who thinks that this dep:{build,...} thing looks really
13 ugly and is hard to read?
14
15 IMO simply removing the "dep" part would greatly improve things:
16
17 DEPENDENCIES="
18 :build,run? ( ... )
19 :run? ( ... )
20 "
21
22 s/:/@/ would also be interesting
23
24 DEPENDENCIES="
25 @build,run? ( ... )
26 @run? ( ... )
27 "
28
29 Alex | wired

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>