| 1 |
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:42:26 +0100 |
| 2 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
[...] |
| 5 |
> I have no idea if it makes sense for this package (since it also |
| 6 |
> installs binaries), but as an example I have converted dev-libs/serd. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
yes, that's the kind of usage of your eclass I was thinking about :) |
| 9 |
(it might make sense to convert it but there is no need for it I know |
| 10 |
about, there might arise some commercial binary-only package using it |
| 11 |
some day) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> And yes, a rename of the eclass would probably be appropriate. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+1 |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Alexis. |
Archives