| 1 |
On Thu, 14 May 2009 13:17:24 -0600 |
| 2 |
RB <aoz.syn@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 13:11, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 4 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Please explain why you claimed GLEP 55 makes things slower. Until |
| 6 |
> > you answer that, it's hard to take you for anything other than a |
| 7 |
> > troll. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Hell, I'll explain. Read paragraph 8 again. Slowly. Read it a |
| 10 |
> second time, since you obviously didn't read the first time. The |
| 11 |
> paragraph makes the point that the pro-GLEP55 stance says that |
| 12 |
> encoding EAPI inside the file is slower. It is not saying GLEP55 is |
| 13 |
> slower, it is attempting to debunk the theory that it is faster. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
"so with glep55 caching it is actually slower!" |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
There's no possible way that can make sense. Whatever he's claiming by |
| 18 |
that is obviously nonsense. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives