| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I don't have enough time to go through the rest of this thread, but if |
| 5 |
the first sentence hasn't been adjusted yet: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 29/03/13 08:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 8 |
> If you still have network interface renaming rules in |
| 9 |
> /etc/udev/rules.d, like 70-persistent-net.rules, you will need to |
| 10 |
> modify or remove them. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Might I recommend at least a little bit of context before going right |
| 14 |
into "you have to remove these rules"? IE - if a user wants to keep |
| 15 |
the old mac-based rules they already have, can't they? 80-*.rules |
| 16 |
doesn't override that now, does it? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'd recommend: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
"As of version 197, udev now provides predictable interface renaming |
| 21 |
based directly on [hardware addresses and whatever other info]. The |
| 22 |
old MAC-based relabelling in prior udev versions has been removed, and |
| 23 |
it is highly recommended to migrate to the new version." |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
...as the first paragraph. Then follow with the rest. Friendly? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlFV6WMACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAMAAD/aJC64ISmRlspep2FU3vuBHuB |
| 33 |
o+tEueMLIrNnHgNtC7sA/0JIl9H5gbX6talhmPkxKLbMdcaAAWvB4osN1pgWC45H |
| 34 |
=XH7f |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives