| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 19:42 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:36:44 -0400 Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | Is it just me, it seems that only sparc/mips devs want that kind of |
| 5 |
> | change and non none of the x86/amd64 devs... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The people who have worked with such a system before and understand how |
| 8 |
> it works and what all it can do want change. Those who don't understand |
| 9 |
> the system and think that it has all kinds of problems that are really |
| 10 |
> just a lack of understanding don't want it to change. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Maybe, but please give one example of such an 'explanation' that any of |
| 14 |
the pro-merge devs have given. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> | I still dont see what practical advantage that would bring to |
| 17 |
> | x86/amd64 users or developers? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> QA. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Possible, but once again, why will a merge give 'better' QA ? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Martin Schlemmer |
Archives