| 1 |
On 14.08.2012 16:35, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14/08/2012 02:57, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff over /usr/lib/$pkg/ |
| 4 |
>> on "daily basis" |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So instead of discussing this you just decide you don't like the path |
| 7 |
> and go with your preference? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Honestly I would have preferred for this to go through council as _it |
| 10 |
> already went through it once_.... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Sorry I was vague in that statement, I meant moving to both /usr/lib/ |
| 14 |
when suitable (and usually the default from upstream lately) and |
| 15 |
/usr/lib64/xfce* (Location of .so Xfce plugins) |
| 16 |
Xfce had compability code for finding plugins from /usr/libexec only for |
| 17 |
4.10 series, and is marked as -DXFCE_DEPRECATED code, 4.12 will solely |
| 18 |
use /usr/lib64/xfce4/ |
| 19 |
I've done nothing against the status quo, only following sane reasoning |
| 20 |
and defaults from upstreams who have made a strong case for it being so, |
| 21 |
or when they have actually made it impossible without carrying custom |
| 22 |
patches forever |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
So all good, I hope this cleared misunderstandings |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- Samuli |
Archives