| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 08/15/2013 01:23 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> Dnia 2013-08-15, o godz. 00:19:40 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| 6 |
> napisał(a): |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true |
| 11 |
>>> PM for Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to |
| 12 |
>>> decide. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> I think that would make sense. We don't have enough resources for |
| 16 |
>> such fun and overcoming PMS burdens has been a major concern for |
| 17 |
>> everyone who is looking to improve basic functionality. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> And do we have the resources to fix the tree every time someone |
| 20 |
> decides on an awesome improvement that obviously can't hurt |
| 21 |
> anything? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I have no idea what that means. Global changes are _always_ discussed |
| 25 |
in the community. PMS doesn't add anything to that process. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSDB0TAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzU/sH/1ml/Zq/p/bxju9u/w+7Alxg |
| 32 |
9PTUXVZRcGTlOT5+DDSYIUB8R0j0bKMxJLuJKPovNfIF42YyD4uQs2ewcScpQ+s8 |
| 33 |
y8wTfFOTUwpfnRJdhLDGguw4MOFPpHMTQgAKhiY00SUgfuzBEyUoZ6OuqDdyoeUc |
| 34 |
RapXUBK4qrDFJ8s/6tsLCKtca7Jv47Ct6deNk8CWauKz3t1Zj65Qtb5qAYkc2wu5 |
| 35 |
sYLOidwLhUID6v/eGfZ+HhFRAkBawRfWnc5fn+Mz9SLSKxecYUX34F+3ZA99Pc+U |
| 36 |
sUYVsvgz4PN9qOUxb9m7q9Ii4yLxni6vJS48C6pQN62Yv7M0PUmHLWK6GN+dFew= |
| 37 |
=PG3m |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives