1 |
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:46:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> It warns noisily. |
3 |
|
4 |
Then it's not even close to being broken and i don't see the need for |
5 |
a news item. |
6 |
|
7 |
> It doesn't say how to fix it. |
8 |
|
9 |
I'm sure that can be arranged even without a news item. |
10 |
|
11 |
> > Imho the whole GLEP process is being abused to define some scenario to |
12 |
> > get the support for news, and then push it through for stuff way |
13 |
> > outside the boundaries defined in the GLEP. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Hardly... Not having the news item will cause considerable user |
16 |
> confusion. |
17 |
|
18 |
Then you may need to rewrite the GLEP so it allows news items whenever |
19 |
something confuses users, not just the critical updates |
20 |
(e.g. incompatible mysql upgrades or the apache 2 config upgrade were |
21 |
used as examples) described in the GLEP. |
22 |
|
23 |
cheers, |
24 |
Wernfried |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org |
28 |
http://forums.gentoo.org || http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/proctors/ |
29 |
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org || proctors (at) gentoo.org |
30 |
#gentoo-forums || #gentoo-proctors (freenode) |