1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> It shouldn't cause any problems for anybody that has OpenLDAP installed |
7 |
> as a client only, but it's a bit bumpy for those that are running |
8 |
> OpenLDAP servers. |
9 |
|
10 |
Before this package goes stable, I'd like to suggest that backwardly |
11 |
compatible libraries be provided so that applications aren't horribly |
12 |
broken by this upgrade (similar to how we've done for openssl in the past). |
13 |
|
14 |
On two different test systems, this upgrade caused broken dynamic library |
15 |
dependencies in over 35 packages on each system. I'm going to hazard a |
16 |
guess that a majority of systems that have openldap installed have more |
17 |
than one or two packages depending on openldap (and probably aren't |
18 |
dedicated LDAP servers). For those folks who use LDAP for various thing, |
19 |
I could see this as being a very big gotcha. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
Cheers, |
23 |
- -- |
24 |
Jason Wever |
25 |
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead |
26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
27 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
28 |
|
29 |
iD8DBQFCjLOCdKvgdVioq28RAkbiAJ0RWLtV2T8TFuvXUriJVoPu4eAYIQCguPmW |
30 |
k/vPBXhefN2Gf7fop50laoE= |
31 |
=VtpG |
32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |