Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] eclass caching fix. was More unhappy news for overlay-utilizing devs :(
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:07
Message-Id: 1109065410.7949.2.camel@Darkmere
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] eclass caching fix. was More unhappy news for overlay-utilizing devs :( by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 20:16 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2 >
3 > No! Don't tell me portage is finally using a sane numbering scheme!
4
5 *Hands on ears singing the smurf-theme loudly*
6 LA LA lala LA LAAAAA!
7
8 ..... I won't believe it I don't believe it, I can't believe it until
9 its staable.....
10
11
12
13 --
14 begin .signature
15 Tortured users / Laughing in pain
16 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
17 end

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature