From: | Spider <spider@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] eclass caching fix. was More unhappy news for overlay-utilizing devs :( | ||
Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:07 | ||
Message-Id: | 1109065410.7949.2.camel@Darkmere | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] eclass caching fix. was More unhappy news for overlay-utilizing devs :( by Donnie Berkholz |
1 | On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 20:16 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > No! Don't tell me portage is finally using a sane numbering scheme! |
4 | |
5 | *Hands on ears singing the smurf-theme loudly* |
6 | LA LA lala LA LAAAAA! |
7 | |
8 | ..... I won't believe it I don't believe it, I can't believe it until |
9 | its staable..... |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | begin .signature |
15 | Tortured users / Laughing in pain |
16 | See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
17 | end |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |