| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Brian Harring wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 08:01:17PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>If we should use it, it would be helpful if we didn't have to keep track |
| 8 |
>>of where it was (i.e., apply it to released portage as a patch). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> E'yep. :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Until 2.0.51.16 is stabled, pushing patches into the tree isn't an option though. Pushing out a 2.0.51-r16 isn't |
| 13 |
> really viable. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You actually just touched on the reason why portage is jumping from .51-rN to .51.N; so we can use the -rN version |
| 16 |
> component to push out patches while releases are being put through the testing process... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
No! Don't tell me portage is finally using a sane numbering scheme! |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iD8DBQFCGrIbXVaO67S1rtsRAhzFAKCRDD6lhIUBrx3BpWqqcSJtbKA3lgCdHXvi |
| 23 |
sPXWa+aWCMGZvy24rJ4Ejlk= |
| 24 |
=1NcF |
| 25 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives