1 |
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:39:05 +0100 Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
| On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 17:57 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
| > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:23:08 +0100 Peter Ruskin |
4 |
| > <Peter.Ruskin@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
| > | On Monday 18 October 2004 14:41, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
6 |
| > | > USE="@KDE -@GNOME" |
7 |
| > | > becomes |
8 |
| > | > USE="kde qt arts X -gnome -gtk -esd -X" |
9 |
| > | > becomes |
10 |
| > | > USE="kde qt arts" |
11 |
| > | |
12 |
| > | I still don't see the need for all this grouping stuff, but if |
13 |
| > | we're going to get it, will USE="@KDE -@GNOME" gtk work - I mean, |
14 |
| > | wil it result in USE="kde qt arts gtk"? |
15 |
| > |
16 |
| > Yes. It'll also result in USE="-X"... |
17 |
| > |
18 |
| |
19 |
| Would USE="-@GNOME @KDE" result in USE="-X"? |
20 |
|
21 |
No. It'd result in USE="X". |
22 |
|
23 |
| From rom present USE behaviour it seems to be parsed left-to-right, so |
24 |
| would not. Just a point for my own clarification... |
25 |
|
26 |
Yup. Think of the @STUFF as macro expansion, plus a bit of clever |
27 |
trickery to handle -@BLAH. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) |
31 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
32 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |