| 1 |
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 17:57 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:23:08 +0100 Peter Ruskin |
| 3 |
> <Peter.Ruskin@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | On Monday 18 October 2004 14:41, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> | > USE="@KDE -@GNOME" |
| 6 |
> | > becomes |
| 7 |
> | > USE="kde qt arts X -gnome -gtk -esd -X" |
| 8 |
> | > becomes |
| 9 |
> | > USE="kde qt arts" |
| 10 |
> | |
| 11 |
> | I still don't see the need for all this grouping stuff, but if we're |
| 12 |
> | going to get it, will USE="@KDE -@GNOME" gtk work - I mean, wil it |
| 13 |
> | result in USE="kde qt arts gtk"? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Yes. It'll also result in USE="-X"... |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Would USE="-@GNOME @KDE" result in USE="-X"? |
| 19 |
From rom present USE behaviour it seems to be parsed left-to-right, so would |
| 20 |
not. Just a point for my own clarification... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.org> |
Archives