| 1 |
On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>>>>>> And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general |
| 6 |
>>>>>>> progress in gentoo. |
| 7 |
>>>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>>>> Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works |
| 9 |
>>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>> You certainly are not an authority when it comes to that |
| 11 |
>>>>> question... |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> Well no |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>>> exactly |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Stop it. Now. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> gentoo-dev is a list for technical topics, so please take your |
| 20 |
>> personal quarrels elsewhere. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> Ulrich |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Last warning for both hasufell and Ciaran. Keep the discussion on |
| 26 |
> acceptable technical and polite levels or go away |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I'm quite surprised that you attack hasufell now for his valid opinion |
| 30 |
that PMS is not well maintained and does not reflect reality adequately. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
(not well maintained: simple patches take months to get applied, and |
| 33 |
even then often need council interference to be applied. Does not |
| 34 |
reflect reality: Multiple cases like mandating bash 3.2 that we don't |
| 35 |
even have in tree anymore, so no compliance testing possible. Not |
| 36 |
documenting package.mask as a directory for EAPI0 even when that feature |
| 37 |
existed in portage before the initial release of PMS. Etc. etc.) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
And I really do not appreciate this weirdness of "LAST WARNING!!11" ... |
| 40 |
it doesn't work on 6-year-olds, so don't expect it to work on a group of |
| 41 |
strongly individualist nerds. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Makes me want to tell you "Last warning! Don't warn people again, OR |
| 44 |
ELSE!" just to see what happens. |
Archives