| 1 |
konsolebox posted on Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:09:03 +0800 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Sorry, but I don't get it. How would these be different from the |
| 5 |
>> existing "=pkg-1.0.2a*" and "=pkg-1.0.2*"? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Because they could also match pkg-1.0.2aa (not sure if it's still valid |
| 8 |
> atom) and pkg-1.0.20 respectively. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
What about combining (positive) deps and blockers, deping on =pkg-1.0.2a* |
| 11 |
and blocking >=pkg-1.0.2b ? Wouldn't that resolve the unintended matches? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 15 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 16 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives