Archives
Archives
| From: | konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. | ||
| Date: | Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:09:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJnmqwZPRjLmm8fmoC4NNa_4NuanGqhNi3Uxz3tck+GXXL1mEg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Sorry, but I don't get it. How would these be different from the |
| 3 | > existing "=pkg-1.0.2a*" and "=pkg-1.0.2*"? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Because they could also match pkg-1.0.2aa (not sure if it's still |
| 6 | valid atom) and pkg-1.0.20 respectively. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |