| 1 |
On Friday 01 July 2005 03:55 am, Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Why not just use =qt-3.3 since qt3 probably wont have any new major |
| 3 |
> > release ? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> This would seem like the easiest option. Is there any reason not to do |
| 6 |
> it this way? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yes, two of them. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
1. You don't know that there won't be a 3.4 qt |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
2. You'll force a user to upgrade to qt 3.3 if they attempt to install any |
| 13 |
package that depends on Qt. Speaking from personal experience, I still have |
| 14 |
some servers using Qt 3.1 because I have programs running 24/7 that rely on |
| 15 |
Qt and simply cannot be upgraded right now. |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives