Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass | ||
| Date: | Fri, 01 Jul 2005 08:57:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | 623652d50507010155ab4e2df@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass by Olivier Crete |
||
| 1 | On 30/06/05, Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > On Thu, 2005-30-06 at 15:09 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
| 3 | > > |
| 4 | > > I'm sorry, yes, that's what I do in this case. |
| 5 | > > |
| 6 | > > Also, the eclass is in portage if anyone is so inclined to see how harmless it |
| 7 | > > really i |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Why not just use =qt-3.3 since qt3 probably wont have any new major |
| 10 | > release ? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | This would seem like the easiest option. Is there any reason not to do |
| 13 | it this way? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass | Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass | Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o> |