| 1 |
On Friday 01 July 2005 11:55, Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 30/06/05, Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, 2005-30-06 at 15:09 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I'm sorry, yes, that's what I do in this case. |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Also, the eclass is in portage if anyone is so inclined to see how |
| 7 |
> > > harmless it really i |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Why not just use =qt-3.3 since qt3 probably wont have any new major |
| 10 |
> > release ? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> This would seem like the easiest option. Is there any reason not to do |
| 13 |
> it this way? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Sometimes we need to specify a minimal version or revision because something |
| 16 |
depends on specific fixes made there and needs to force a qt upgrade. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Dan Armak |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
| 21 |
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |
| 22 |
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 |
Archives