| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-30-06 at 15:09 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 30 June 2005 03:01 pm, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
| 3 |
> > It seems that portage evaluates disjonction left to right and |
| 4 |
> > stops on the first match it founds. Thus, if you want want it to |
| 5 |
> > choose the best matching version, you should rather sort them in |
| 6 |
> > decreasing order. (At least, that's what a small test with CVS |
| 7 |
> > HEAD shows here.) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'm sorry, yes, that's what I do in this case. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Also, the eclass is in portage if anyone is so inclined to see how harmless it |
| 12 |
> really i |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Why not just use =qt-3.3 since qt3 probably wont have any new major |
| 15 |
release ? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Olivier Crête |
| 20 |
tester@g.o |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
x86 Security Liaison |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives