Archives
Archives
| From: | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy | ||
| Date: | Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:05:22 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201401150106.20742.dilfridge@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy by Tom Wijsman |
||
| 1 | Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 00:49:28 schrieb Tom Wijsman: |
| 2 | > On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:37:19 -0600 |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 | > > Thoughts? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > In this situation, I see three opposite ends of choices: |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Here's another idea: |
| 11 | |
| 12 | 4. Friendly ask the arch teams / make a policy that @system packages come |
| 13 | first. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | (maybe these stable requests could be marked "major" in bugzilla then?) |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Andreas K. Huettel |
| 21 | Gentoo Linux developer |
| 22 | dilfridge@g.o |
| 23 | http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy | Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> |