| 1 |
On 01/14/2014 07:06 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 00:49:28 schrieb Tom Wijsman: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:37:19 -0600 |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> Thoughts? |
| 7 |
>> In this situation, I see three opposite ends of choices: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> Here's another idea: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> 4. Friendly ask the arch teams / make a policy that @system packages come |
| 12 |
> first. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> (maybe these stable requests could be marked "major" in bugzilla then?) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Actually that's a very good idea. In fact, since those are the critical |
| 19 |
packages we can have the arch teams focus on them, and allow more relax |
| 20 |
policies of stabilization on less critical packages. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 28 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 29 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 30 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives