Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Jory A. Pratt" <anarchy@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:18:56
Message-Id: 44AD8A12.8000600@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags by Ciaran McCreesh
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 > On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:31:56 -0700 Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o>
6 > wrote:
7 > | Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreeing
8 > | with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel it
9 > | should be done and show the technical merit. Ciaran I will give you
10 > | that you are a capable programmer, and had valid arguments in this
11 > | thread. However, when interacting with people and proving points on
12 > | merits you seem to go out of your way to not prove anything and throw
13 > | examples out there without really backing them up.
14 >
15 > No, I go out of my way to avoid posting hundred page essays explaining
16 > things that people already know. If there's really anyone reading this
17 > discussion who doesn't understand any of the points being discussed,
18 > they're more than welcome to ask for clarification. However, given how
19 > basic an issue this is, is it really worth wasting everyone's time with
20 > huge explanations of what CFLAGS is?
21 >
22 > Come on, do you really think anyone will benefit from another
23 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~blubb/duncan.pdf ?
24 >
25
26 Stephen Bennett wrote:
27 > On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:31:56 -0700
28 > Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o> wrote:
29 >
30 >> Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreeing
31 >> with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel it
32 >> should be done and show the technical merit.
33 >
34 > He already has done.
35
36
37 After reading this thread I can see this is just another one of ciaran's
38 b.s games that Stephen happens to back. My question is just how far up
39 ciaran's ass does stephen go. I am begining to think we will never get
40 to the end if ciaran and his bullshit around gentoo, nor will we ever
41 get rid of stephen's bullshit around gentoo. But the project continues
42 to allow such non-sence and wonders why devs are still walking away.
43
44
45
46 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
47 Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
48 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
49
50 iD8DBQFErYoRo9V4dnAHxYwRAiq7AJ4+kLNig3h0Ra8k9CuLJynDFBuC+QCgiq/W
51 BFKmn9FzOXFhWgBt8rSbUdo=
52 =wTC0
53 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
54 --
55 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags Curtis Napier <curtis119@g.o>