1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 02-10-2010 03:01, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
5 |
> On 10:20 Sat 02 Oct , Alistair Bush wrote: |
6 |
>> How is this news item going to help ppl in a month from now (till the |
7 |
>> issue is solved in its entirety). Can we reasonably expect a new user |
8 |
>> to be aware of this. Do we expect users to read old ( and this could |
9 |
>> potentially become very old) news items. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> As soon as new stages get built with portage 2.1.9 (i.e., as soon as it |
12 |
> goes stable, as I understand the autobuild process), it should no longer |
13 |
> be a problem for fresh installations. |
14 |
|
15 |
You're correct. The weekly stages are built from the latest stable |
16 |
revisions of packages in the tree. |
17 |
|
18 |
- -- |
19 |
Regards, |
20 |
|
21 |
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
22 |
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng |
23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) |
25 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
26 |
|
27 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMpy6tAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEP20MQAJpCm+GfPvg/K2JEyXLvPkHu |
28 |
7lRDM6rojOtH2nSxFW+WElGM0ly6CWj6xvm5vfPRD7dIisihrVPxDStOUI5hM3uV |
29 |
I1+IBecRyNlc7DPDBCOtMDbrzFpVlFTKM0p20eIIL5inimtfoVO6Iowps97KoW3M |
30 |
zmO0gTKdqWbBKmDzsAb/8seAWDNm0oKGURDL1gaYjQGUO3vckk7Ft2JBsQVg8Qy3 |
31 |
XLfjv9ft12TKUo/DFwowIf0IsFQooHWbrN77jDM9BjlzyTtrVFi3anZF5SdkLMYR |
32 |
I7VpKxhKEWaCJcyjyRZzo1QbvcvLAunPTbXZ2gwImisCzxp5gfRod3RwQpT8QGVb |
33 |
QlQeNo6PfaLlipA3EB17ZFVD5pU33YCGrbgLAOOe5a5bTWy1LK4NDdPmbW7cUL5d |
34 |
9XpiADNlXP6gD1tDcqMHwo0zZa7F5YW/dwKGo/F3A296gD6l0zqIxp+AL6Rk7Awy |
35 |
W18YxFNPly6pFgktaJLicE1nPOKfbqvI7Dwcu534untfZUWSS1XQBCkRRW8Gtq+i |
36 |
jX41YWatE0cltKd7uBEyuc6fVAR3rAtHzpXHgNrh+04dVFrkJcUeJun+JiIAE1WU |
37 |
j+mN/NMD4ylqvzgQyS/YTMOBSVQW3EvFnq+p7H8OxHoH7XzQNSQkLsrAOBFcnPn6 |
38 |
3c6pxdEd9ZCzDi4y9fuj |
39 |
=hm// |
40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |