1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Monday 25 August 2003 04:46 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
5 |
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 04:18, Luke-Jr wrote: |
6 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
7 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > On Sunday 24 August 2003 08:15 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
10 |
> > > Man pages is an integrate part of a system in my opinion - how anyhow |
11 |
> > > are you going to tell them to RTFM if not there :P |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Have the install manual suggest installation of them. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> O.K. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> > > > ext2/ext3 are still considered Linux native, so that may be |
18 |
> > > > justification for their inclusion in system, if not for the fact that |
19 |
> > > > reiserfs is a bad idea for a /boot partition... I wouldn't have any |
20 |
> > > > objection to their removal from system, though. |
21 |
> > > |
22 |
> > > e2fsprogs provide /sbin/fsck ... 8) |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > fsck, unless I'm mistaken, merely detects the filesystem and runs |
25 |
> > fsck.{ext3,xfs,reiserfs,etc}. It could probably be provided by all |
26 |
> > packages which provide a fsck, or baselayout. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Ok, and who wants to bloat now ? I have diff filesystems on diff |
29 |
> partition depending on what it is used for (and I bet I am not the |
30 |
> only one). |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I also guess you are going to rip fsck, or code a new one, and maintain |
33 |
> it for all ... |
34 |
fsck is merely a redirector to the proper fsck.* program. There's no real |
35 |
reason it needs to be provided by a specific filesystem's package. |
36 |
- -- |
37 |
Luke-Jr |
38 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
39 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
40 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
41 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
42 |
|
43 |
iD8DBQE/ShMfZl/BHdU+lYMRAuQuAJsHypZByqOGgPdmlDGcW6+bxpf9bgCggC3V |
44 |
+sFB+0uq69spZOclJzw8sr0= |
45 |
=d1V0 |
46 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |