1 |
On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu> wrote: |
3 |
> > Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 02/10/05, R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > >>I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but |
6 |
> > >>whatever stirs your pot. ;P |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everything else. |
9 |
> > > Why bloat your kernel with an extra FS just for /boot? |
10 |
In addition, why bloat your fs by having a journaled filesystem for |
11 |
essentially static files? |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Because most people want a tried and true fs on /boot, because if that |
14 |
> > tanks your system doesn't boot. I'm not trying to bash reiser here, I |
15 |
> > still use ext2 on /boot even if xfs is my main fs of choice for this reason. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Being able to boot a kernel isn't much use without a root fs. If I |
18 |
> can't boot, I have a livecd sitting on my desk. I guess if I had a |
19 |
> ramdisk on /boot with a shell and some recovery tools then I might |
20 |
> care, but I don't. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> -- |
23 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |