| 1 |
On 02/10/05, Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > On 02/10/05, R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > >>I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but |
| 7 |
> > > >>whatever stirs your pot. ;P |
| 8 |
> > > > |
| 9 |
> > > > It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everything else. |
| 10 |
> > > > Why bloat your kernel with an extra FS just for /boot? |
| 11 |
> In addition, why bloat your fs by having a journaled filesystem for |
| 12 |
> essentially static files? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Because it's easier to have a single fs for / than have multiple |
| 15 |
partitions, and try to isolate all of the things that are "essentially |
| 16 |
static" and move them over to unjournalled file systems. Journalling |
| 17 |
operations on /boot are responsible for filling a very, very small |
| 18 |
percentage of my hard disk. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives