| 1 |
On Saturday 19 November 2005 02:19 pm, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Minor? What you're asking for will cause a lot of administrative |
| 3 |
> > nightmare for infra to manage those subdomain addresses among other |
| 4 |
> > things. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Frankly I think you're exagerating here. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
What about the end-user headache of having to change subscriptions/bugzilla |
| 9 |
accounts/aliases/etc. from username@××××××××××××××××.org to |
| 10 |
username@g.o should they turn dev? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> It's a crazy notion, but y'all could've commented in the *TWO* months |
| 13 |
> that this glep has been percolating, "yo, what do you want from an |
| 14 |
> infra standpoint?". |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Yeah, my bad.. Had I known that infrastructure implementation decisions could |
| 17 |
be decided by a GLEP with no infra input requested, I would have paid |
| 18 |
attention. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Besides, when I first read the glep "*TWO* months ago" there was nothing about |
| 21 |
email subdomains.. It was fine.. Therefore, I did not comment. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> That's why you're on this ml- that is why gleps get sent to this ml- so |
| 24 |
> that all of the various groups can weigh in. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Yup. And as soon as it caught my eye I weighed in.. and you're not happy |
| 27 |
with it. -shrug- Next GLEP will be how to use constructive SUBJECT lines |
| 28 |
for people who have too much email to keep up with so stuff like this will be |
| 29 |
caught sooner. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> I see this mainly as infra/trustees not watching the ML. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Foundation has nothing to do with this issue whatsoever. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> Sucks, but too damn bad. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
So will be finding help from infra to implement this with that attitude. |
| 38 |
You're not helping the situation, Brian.. Kurt and Lance have spent the past |
| 39 |
few hours talking about implementing this while you blast them on the list. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> I'm going to keep my mouth shut on the backdoor comment, aside from |
| 42 |
> stating that's behaviour I hope to _never_ see out of a trustee again. |
| 43 |
> ~harring |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Okay, you have already pinged me on IRC about this since my original |
| 46 |
correction was not good enough for you. I corrected my wrong in this thread, |
| 47 |
but I still feel that the lack of delay between the changes and the vote was |
| 48 |
not enough for devs to comment (specifically Lance). I don't care if I am a |
| 49 |
trustee or not, that's wrong. After your last email, I don't think you are |
| 50 |
in any position to comment on behaviour. ;) |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-- |
| 53 |
Corey Shields |
| 54 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team |
| 55 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 56 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives