Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:39:14
Message-Id: CAEdQ38GOa7HOTNXdQe9vEBTOdXeobH0aosJZh5GCWdPZr4cfnQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git by hasufell
1 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
2 > So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
3 > missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
4 > pretty clear:
5 >
6 > reference the bug only in the summary: 1
7 > don't make any of this mandatory: 1
8 > "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9
9 > "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3
10
11 I'm in favor of Gentoo-Bug: <url> in case we're voting. I don't see
12 much use in the "Gentoo-" prefix if it's a URL though. In that case,
13 just Bug: <url> seems better.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git Dmitry Yu Okunev <dyokunev@××××××××.ru>