| 1 |
On 08/12/2015 08:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I |
| 4 |
>> missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is |
| 5 |
>> pretty clear: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> reference the bug only in the summary: 1 |
| 8 |
>> don't make any of this mandatory: 1 |
| 9 |
>> "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9 |
| 10 |
>> "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'm in favor of Gentoo-Bug: <url> in case we're voting. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
May be "Bug-Gentoo" should be used instead. It's to use the same header |
| 15 |
name format as Debian in their patches ("Bug-Debian"). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, Dmitry |
Archives