Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:54:15
Message-Id: 55CB883A.5050108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git by Dmitry Yu Okunev
1 On 08/12/2015 07:48 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
2 >
3 >
4 > On 08/12/2015 08:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
5 >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
6 >>> So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
7 >>> missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
8 >>> pretty clear:
9 >>>
10 >>> reference the bug only in the summary: 1
11 >>> don't make any of this mandatory: 1
12 >>> "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9
13 >>> "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3
14 >>
15 >> I'm in favor of Gentoo-Bug: <url> in case we're voting.
16 >
17 > May be "Bug-Gentoo" should be used instead. It's to use the same header
18 > name format as Debian in their patches ("Bug-Debian").
19 >
20
21 I'm out of the discussion. Do whatever you want with bug references. We
22 clearly need more different opinions.
23
24 Someone end the bikeshed train please.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o>