1 |
On 08/12/2015 07:48 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On 08/12/2015 08:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
5 |
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>>> So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I |
7 |
>>> missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is |
8 |
>>> pretty clear: |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> reference the bug only in the summary: 1 |
11 |
>>> don't make any of this mandatory: 1 |
12 |
>>> "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9 |
13 |
>>> "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3 |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> I'm in favor of Gentoo-Bug: <url> in case we're voting. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> May be "Bug-Gentoo" should be used instead. It's to use the same header |
18 |
> name format as Debian in their patches ("Bug-Debian"). |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
I'm out of the discussion. Do whatever you want with bug references. We |
22 |
clearly need more different opinions. |
23 |
|
24 |
Someone end the bikeshed train please. |