Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Ostrow <dostrow@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: dostrow@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Niches and new developers (especially xbox)
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 20:53:19
Message-Id: 40B2614D.7030001@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Niches and new developers (especially xbox) by Pieter Van den Abeele
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Here is my take on it:
5
6 #1: Supporting architectures as an ideal is not necessarily a bad thing,
7 even niche ones, as sometimes things get brought to the table that
8 further larger goals. Even if all it means is the maintenance of some
9 patches. If someone wants to help the community by porting Gentoo great,
10 so long as the project falls completely within the purview of Gentoo
11 Technologies, Inc. regarding copyrights and procedures. This last
12 statement is where the legality issue comes in, we have to decide if
13 something that isn't expressly illegal really is then legal, and that is
14 a call I'm not willing to make.
15
16 #2: That being said game consoles as a whole are a constantly moving
17 target. Simply because the Xbox is an x86 architecture machine today
18 does not make it's next generation an x86 arch. So the question is are
19 they coming in as x86 devs or Xbox devs? There is no guarantee that the
20 next version of the machines are going to be supportable in the same
21 manner. So we then open the door to a new sub-arch for each console that
22 comes to market.
23
24 #3: As far as I am concerned the security issue comes into play just as
25 much with a dev working on a major arch, the more people you accept the
26 bigger the security hole and that is the bottom line, the size of the
27 supported platform really doesn't matter.
28
29 So I've given some pro's and con's but when it comes down to it, as long
30 as it is able to truly legally be done, go for it. Especially with a
31 project like the Xbox it will give the devs an opportunity to learn
32 about the x86 arch as a whole, and possibly extend their
33 responsibilities, this should be discussed with the leads of x86. As
34 with any dev that is being considered without prior involvement in the
35 community the onus falls on the mentor to make sure that things go
36 smoothly, if vapier is willing to carry that then so be it. I'm just too
37 gray on the legality issue to fully throw my support behind it.
38
39 Thanks,
40
41 Daniel Ostrow
42 Gentoo/PPC
43 dostrow@g.o
44 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
45 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
46 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
47
48 iD8DBQFAsmFNsb0gXCN8LgURAt0UAKCoSJG0jF/Y6FyZGcB4RmLuBgnofwCgipWk
49 lgoZBOokp2k4gjtMHjkC86Q=
50 =H29a
51 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
52
53 --
54 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Niches and new developers (especially xbox) seanecovel <seanecovel@×××××××.net>