1 |
Daniel Ostrow wrote: |
2 |
> Here is my take on it: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> #1: Supporting architectures as an ideal is not necessarily a bad thing, |
5 |
> even niche ones, as sometimes things get brought to the table that |
6 |
> further larger goals. Even if all it means is the maintenance of some |
7 |
> patches. If someone wants to help the community by porting Gentoo great, |
8 |
> so long as the project falls completely within the purview of Gentoo |
9 |
> Technologies, Inc. regarding copyrights and procedures. This last |
10 |
> statement is where the legality issue comes in, we have to decide if |
11 |
> something that isn't expressly illegal really is then legal, and that is |
12 |
> a call I'm not willing to make. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> #2: That being said game consoles as a whole are a constantly moving |
15 |
> target. Simply because the Xbox is an x86 architecture machine today |
16 |
> does not make it's next generation an x86 arch. So the question is are |
17 |
> they coming in as x86 devs or Xbox devs? There is no guarantee that the |
18 |
> next version of the machines are going to be supportable in the same |
19 |
> manner. So we then open the door to a new sub-arch for each console that |
20 |
> comes to market. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> #3: As far as I am concerned the security issue comes into play just as |
23 |
> much with a dev working on a major arch, the more people you accept the |
24 |
> bigger the security hole and that is the bottom line, the size of the |
25 |
> supported platform really doesn't matter. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> So I've given some pro's and con's but when it comes down to it, as long |
28 |
> as it is able to truly legally be done, go for it. Especially with a |
29 |
> project like the Xbox it will give the devs an opportunity to learn |
30 |
> about the x86 arch as a whole, and possibly extend their |
31 |
> responsibilities, this should be discussed with the leads of x86. As |
32 |
> with any dev that is being considered without prior involvement in the |
33 |
> community the onus falls on the mentor to make sure that things go |
34 |
> smoothly, if vapier is willing to carry that then so be it. I'm just too |
35 |
> gray on the legality issue to fully throw my support behind it. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Thanks, |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Daniel Ostrow |
40 |
> Gentoo/PPC |
41 |
> dostrow@g.o |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
As an Xbox Linux user, and a Gentoo user, I'd love to have Gentoo |
45 |
running on my Xbox. From the discussion above, I can't seem to |
46 |
understand if there was a final decision made. Seems like it just died |
47 |
(again...) What are the chances of having an official Gentoo port of |
48 |
Xbox Linux? |
49 |
|
50 |
Sean |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |