| 1 |
seanecovel wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Daniel Ostrow wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Here is my take on it: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> #1: Supporting architectures as an ideal is not necessarily a bad thing, |
| 7 |
>> even niche ones, as sometimes things get brought to the table that |
| 8 |
>> further larger goals. Even if all it means is the maintenance of some |
| 9 |
>> patches. If someone wants to help the community by porting Gentoo great, |
| 10 |
>> so long as the project falls completely within the purview of Gentoo |
| 11 |
>> Technologies, Inc. regarding copyrights and procedures. This last |
| 12 |
>> statement is where the legality issue comes in, we have to decide if |
| 13 |
>> something that isn't expressly illegal really is then legal, and that is |
| 14 |
>> a call I'm not willing to make. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> #2: That being said game consoles as a whole are a constantly moving |
| 17 |
>> target. Simply because the Xbox is an x86 architecture machine today |
| 18 |
>> does not make it's next generation an x86 arch. So the question is are |
| 19 |
>> they coming in as x86 devs or Xbox devs? There is no guarantee that the |
| 20 |
>> next version of the machines are going to be supportable in the same |
| 21 |
>> manner. So we then open the door to a new sub-arch for each console that |
| 22 |
>> comes to market. |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> #3: As far as I am concerned the security issue comes into play just as |
| 25 |
>> much with a dev working on a major arch, the more people you accept the |
| 26 |
>> bigger the security hole and that is the bottom line, the size of the |
| 27 |
>> supported platform really doesn't matter. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> So I've given some pro's and con's but when it comes down to it, as long |
| 30 |
>> as it is able to truly legally be done, go for it. Especially with a |
| 31 |
>> project like the Xbox it will give the devs an opportunity to learn |
| 32 |
>> about the x86 arch as a whole, and possibly extend their |
| 33 |
>> responsibilities, this should be discussed with the leads of x86. As |
| 34 |
>> with any dev that is being considered without prior involvement in the |
| 35 |
>> community the onus falls on the mentor to make sure that things go |
| 36 |
>> smoothly, if vapier is willing to carry that then so be it. I'm just too |
| 37 |
>> gray on the legality issue to fully throw my support behind it. |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> Thanks, |
| 40 |
>> |
| 41 |
>> Daniel Ostrow |
| 42 |
>> Gentoo/PPC |
| 43 |
>> dostrow@g.o |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> As an Xbox Linux user, and a Gentoo user, I'd love to have Gentoo |
| 47 |
> running on my Xbox. From the discussion above, I can't seem to |
| 48 |
> understand if there was a final decision made. Seems like it just died |
| 49 |
> (again...) What are the chances of having an official Gentoo port of |
| 50 |
> Xbox Linux? |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Also an XBOX user... running linux... and loving every minute of it... |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
I hope there's an answer to this DCMA issue. Not being a lawyer, just an old |
| 57 |
fart, it's looks pretty gloom though. |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
-- |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
****************************************************************************** |
| 62 |
Registered Linux User Number 185956 |
| 63 |
FSF Associate Member number 2340 since 05/20/2004 |
| 64 |
Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net |
| 65 |
Buy an Xbox for $149.00, run linux on it and Microsoft loses $150.00! |
| 66 |
3:39pm up 53 days, 18:21, 6 users, load average: 2.78, 2.83, 2.88 |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
-- |
| 70 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives