| 1 |
Hey, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> How would you suggest we track who has commit access, etc? The same |
| 5 |
> way we do with developers, via a developer bug? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I believe proxy maintainers already have a bug assigned to them (at |
| 8 |
least I have one), so maybe just a comment or a special tag would be |
| 9 |
suffient on these bugs to signify commit access. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I ask because I've noticed a lot of inactive proxied maintainers—one |
| 12 |
> of which had been listed in metadata.xml for 6 years but had never |
| 13 |
> committed to ::gentoo. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Should these packages not be dropped to maintainer needed? Just like |
| 17 |
regular developers, wouldn't it be reasonable to expect a minimal level of |
| 18 |
activiy from proxied maintainers (even if not as strict) or otherwise be |
| 19 |
dropped from a package? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Zoltan |
Archives