| 1 |
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:09:01 +0000 John Mylchreest <johnm@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| In this specific instance, impossible is effectively a point of view. |
| 4 |
| For me the question comes down to this.. If QA trump maintainer, then |
| 5 |
| who picks the QA staff? If anyone can become QA staff, then this is |
| 6 |
| questionable in itself. is QA becoming another council with a sole |
| 7 |
| purpose? If so I'd like to see an election again. At the end of the |
| 8 |
| day the pack have to have faith in the team doing the work, and |
| 9 |
| disagreements are obviously contrary to that. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
QA consists of whoever is on the QA project page. To be added, you must |
| 12 |
convince the existing QA team that you know what you're doing. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) |
| 16 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 17 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives